Why Isn’t This Life-Threatening Pesticide Banned on Farms?

Parents who work as farmhands or pickers are often in nearby fields when pesticides like Roundup are sprayed. Farmworkers sometimes even eat fruits that have recently been sprayed. But there is a toxin in many pesticides, called glyphosate, that is linked by two international health organizations to cancer and childhood birth defects including missing or deformed limbs, and many other health issues.

Big money convinces farm-owners and the EPA to approve of harmful pesticides

So why are farm-owners not often worried about exposing their farm workers to these toxic chemicals? Because big dollar corporate ads from giant companies like Monsanto, who make lots of money from the pesticides and special seeds, say that Roundup or similar pesticides are safe. They’ve even used powerful agricultural lobbyists to convince the US government watchdog, the EPA, to greatly increase the legal residue limits for glyphosate on produce sold at stores over the last few years alone. Then, pesticide companies point to these EPA regulations, which they helped create, to support their false claims regarding product safety. Because these company-produced messages are so powerful, homes and farms in America are using more Roundup and similar harmful products than ever, 100,000 lbs annually. But they’ve also become more relaxed about using proper protections to keep from being exposed.

However, both the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the World Health Organization say the products are anything but safe. In fact, while years of testing strongly suggest that glyphosate was likely to cause cancer, more recent tests show that the toxic chemical might actually be more dangerous than scientists first thought. Several tests found glyphosate in the blood of people who use Roundup for their home garden only 30 minutes after they used it. If it has such a quick effect in low household usage, think of how many times unprotected people who work on big farms would find it in their blood?

Sadly, history is repeating itself. Just like the tobacco industry said cigarettes were safe, and corporations said exposure to asbestos was not a problem, now the pesticide companies falsely say that there is simply “not enough information” to claim that their products are dangerous to people’s health. Scientists and parents are trying to lift the silence by voicing their concerns. They want to stop the steady growth in childhood birth defects and other health risks.

Have you been exposed to a harmful pesticide at work?

Nearly every non-industry funded study has found that glyphosate causes cancer, neurological defects, childhood birth defects, and countless other harmful outcomes. If you are a farmworker whose child might have been harmed by pesticide exposure, please contact us. Waters Kraus & Paul offers an experienced team of caring lawyers who will do everything they can to hold farms and corporations responsible. Please click here for more information. Or contact us by phone at 800-226-9880.

Big Island Men Sue Chemical Giant

Three lawsuits filed against Monsanto Co. for herbicide and PCB exposure.

A Honolulu law firm has filed a trio of product liability civil lawsuits this month on behalf of three Big Island men against the chemical giant Monsanto Co. in Hilo Circuit Court.

The civil suits were filed by attorney Ilana K. Waxman of Galiher DeRobertis & Waxman on behalf of Rodney I. Sunaoka and Honey Sunaoka, Dudley Caravalho and Susan Caravalho, and Alan Z. Inaba.

The men, who range in age from 60 to 77, claim exposure to glyphosate — a herbicide marketed by Monsanto as Roundup — and polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, manufactured and marketed by Monsanto in the U.S. until banned in 1979, caused their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

“Rather than pull it off the market, they [Monsanto and parent company, Bayer] have continued to try to deny that it’s even been recognized as a carcinogen by (the International Agency for Research on Canter) and other governmental and nongovernmental agencies from around the world,” Waxman said.

Read the full article.

 

When Consumer Safety Does Not Seem to Matter

AAJ article highlights the ongoing problem with corporations choosing money over honesty and consumer safety.

The American Association for Justice’s (AAJ) newest report highlights corporate misconduct and how it impacts the average U.S. citizen’s everyday life. A consistent lack of transparency from these corporations demonstrates how “when corporations put profits before safety and customer and employee welfare, and the regulatory system proves unable to force change, the civil justice system is the last line of defense to protect consumers.”

Failure to Warn

Companies have both a moral and legal responsibility to warn consumers of potential dangers that can result from their products. Agrochemical company Monsanto decided to go in a different direction. Company emails that came to light as part of litigation detail how a Monsanto executive suggested ghostwriting scientific reports. Those reports eventually led the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conclude that Roundup, a weed killer composed of glyphosate, did not cause cancer.

Lack of Transparency

When a company markets products that are intended to be used for the well-being of its consumers but fails to inform consumers of its products’ safety hazards, that lack of transparency can have dire consequences. Johnson & Johnson (J&J) faced six of the seven largest dangerous-product verdicts in 2016 and faced numerous more in 2017. The following areas of litigation recently involved J&J:

    • Xarelto

This blood thinner, also known as rivaroxaban, has been associated with more than 370 deaths according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, J&J continues to profit making over $2.29 billion from this drug alone.

  • Risperdal
    Risperdal is an antipsychotic drug used to treat certain mental/mood disorders, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and irritability associated with autism. The pharmaceutical company also illegally marketed it as an aide to manage the behavior of elderly nursing home residents, people with mental disabilities, and children. Scientific evidence has shown that teens who use Risperdal are five times more likely to develop gynecomastia—the appearance of female breast tissue. In some of the over 18,000 cases against J&J, the company is accused of concealing evidence that shows gynecomastia rates with Risperdal use are much higher than the company initially claimed.
  • Transvaginal Mesh
    Ethicon, a J&J division, marketed its transvaginal mesh as a low-cost way to treat urinary incontinence for women. What the company failed to disclose is the serious risk of injury associated with the product.
  • Artificial Hips
    When DePuy, a J&J division, first introduced their product in 2005, doctors reported shedding of metallic debris leading to infection, fractures, and nerve damage. Company executives talked about fixing the design flaw, but in the end, chose not to. The artificial hips even failed internal tests, and 40 percent were predicted to fail within five years of implantation. Even after surgeons working with DePuy halted use of the hips, the company continued selling them.

DePuy did not stop sales of the artificial hips until 2010 and then blamed it on poor sales rather than medical complications. Subsequently, juries have returned substantial verdicts in trials where plaintiffs have claimed DePuy failed to properly warn patients and doctors that the devices would fail prematurely.

Aggressive Marketing Tactics

McKesson Corporation has turned opioids into a $13 billion-a-year industry by distributing pain medicines across the country even though the company was aware of the drugs’ highly addictive nature and the fact that they are sold on the black market. Opioids work by attaching to and activating opioid pain receptor proteins, which are found on nerve cells in the brain, spinal cord, gastrointestinal tract, and other organs in the body. When these drugs attach to their receptors, they inhibit the transmission of pain signals.

Distributors like McKesson have overlooked federal regulations requiring companies to report suspicious activity involving narcotic orders such as unusual size and/or frequency. Instead of following these regulations, the AAJ reports that opioid distributors “[f]looded [the] market with enough opioids to keep every person in America medicated around the clock for three weeks” and lined their pockets with money from the sales. According to a 2016 Washington Post report, at least 13 drug distributors knew or should have known that hundreds of millions of prescription opioids were hitting the black market, but continued to send the drugs.” Even when pressed by government regulators to have better oversight concerning distribution, McKesson spent over $100 million lobbying to pass a law that would make it almost impossible for the Drug Enforcement Agency to freeze any questionable narcotics shipments.

Glyphosate Added to Cancer List Despite Monsanto’s Efforts

The Herbicide Glyphosate, a Key Ingredient of Roundup Weed Killer Products, Will be Sent to California’s Cancer-Causing Chemicals List Despite Monsanto’s Efforts to Stay the Decision

The herbicide glyphosate will be added to California’s list of cancer-causing chemicals, as required by Proposition 65, after the state’s Supreme Court rejected Monsanto Co.’s request to stay the ruling of the lower court. Glyphosate is a key ingredient of popular pesticides used in commercial farming, such as Roundup Weed Killer.

Earlier in the year, the lower court rejected Monsanto’s claim that the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment violated the state constitution by delegating authority to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). It was IARC that determined that glyphosate belonged on the cancer-causing chemical list. Monsanto appealed the lower court’s decision in California’s Fifth District, but the state’s Supreme Court ruled that glyphosate can be added to the state’s list of cancer-causing chemicals even while the appeal is still pending.

California’s Proposition 65 was a state ballot initiative that requires the state to publish a list of chemicals that are known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. Monsanto’s arguments that listing glyphosate would violate its right to free speech and that such listing would force the company to include a warning label that the product might cause cancer, was rejected by the judge of the lower court.

Is Glyphosate a Substance Known to Cause Birth Defects?

Glyphosate, the main ingredient in the pesticide Roundup, is a substance well known to cause birth defects. Many studies have linked the herbicide to reproductive problems and severe malformations. Unfortunately, this is an all-too-common experience for pregnant farm workers employed on commercial farms. Frequently, farm owners and labor contractors will fail to warn or protect farm works from exposure to these harmful pesticides.