Documentary Reveals Highly Toxic Roundup Herbicide ‘Everywhere’

When award-winning filmmaker Brian Lilla moved to Napa Valley, California, he quickly learned about the health hazards lurking in wine country. In his new documentary, “Children of the Vine,” Lilla shows how the use of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide and its active ingredient, glyphosate, has affected those who work in and live nearby.

“I didn’t want to run away from the problem,” Lilla said in an interview with the nonprofit publication Capital & Main. “No matter where I go, there’s going to be glyphosate in the food. Yes, it blew my mind to find out how much it’s being used in the vineyards. But I want to make it clear that the vineyards are not the villains, nor are farms.”

Pesticides Expose Hawaiʻi Families to Higher Birth Defect Risk

Families in Hawaiʻi are experiencing dramatic increases in certain serious birth defects, including a rare and serious condition that is being diagnosed at a rate 10 times higher than on the mainland.

Mothers living near farms where pesticides are used are at particular risk, physicians say. The Hawaiʻi Center for Food Safety found that chemical companies have sprayed restricted-use pesticides at a rate 17 times greater than the mainland average.

5 Most Common Ways People Are Exposed to Asbestos

Until about four decades ago, most structures in Hawaii were built with material containing asbestos, including the state’s military bases, state buildings, homes and even schools.

While the health risks from these materials are well-known today, the use of asbestos – while highly regulated in Hawaii – is still allowed in certain products, creating serious risk for anyone who comes in contact with them.

Asbestos is composed of six minerals that occur naturally in the environment as bundles of fibers that can be separated into extremely fine threads for commercial and industrial uses. The fibers are resistant to heat, fire and chemicals and do not conduct electricity.

The History of Asbestos: From Discovery to Personal Injury

Asbestos is a well-known toxic substance now, but the origins of its usage date back thousands of years before it was known to cause diseases like mesothelioma. Some countries like the U.S. have continued to use it in a lesser capacity despite this risk. The start of its use in other durable products such as pottery mixes dates back to 2500 B.C. in Finland. However, the first discovery of its toxicity did not come until 61-112 A.D. when an Ancient Roman scholar studied slaves who became ill working the asbestos mines. It would still take another 2,000 years before scientists would connect asbestos and the illness it causes.

The revelation of the illness caused by asbestos was not made before the toxic mineral’s introduction to the American industry in 1858 when the Johns Company began mining it for use in insulation. The Industrial Revolution further fueled its production and use throughout North America, noting the first industrial asbestos mine opening in Canada in 1879. It was not until 1918 that the U.S. government would recognize the risk of asbestos shortening the life spans of those who worked with the material.

In 1930, the illness known as asbestosis was discovered in connection to asbestos exposure by Dr. Edward Merewether. As a result, industry regulations were placed on British asbestos factories. Still, they did not include the other industries that handled the substance or were involved in its installation. Asbestosis would not be reported in America for another three years. Not until the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company found asbestosis in 29% of workers in an asbestos factory leading to lawsuit settlements.

Asbestosis would not be the only long-term illness in connection with asbestos exposure. Researchers first discovered the link between asbestos exposure and cancer in 1934. The warnings for this risk of cancer relative to asbestos would not come until 1942. A year later, the first mesothelioma-like tumor was reported in Germany. By 1949, asbestos is widely understood to be harmful. Despite this acceptance, the asbestos industry will continue to ignore the warnings of health risks through the 1960s and actively bury or alter the negative research reports before they could reach the public.

The good news is that they did not get away with covering up the dangers of asbestos forever. Eventually, in 1967, the first successful personal injury claim in the U.K. was established. Additional rules closely followed in 1969, which saw the expansion of regulation beyond just the manufacturing process to include every industry that used asbestos. These regulations included requiring the use of exhaust ventilation, protective equipment, and improved handling procedures. While these improvements were welcome, it was not enough to eliminate asbestos-related diseases.

When Congress approved the Clean Air Act, it allowed the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate asbestos as a hazardous air pollutant. Like the U.K., the U.S. only saw increased regulation after the first successful personal injury claim regarding asbestos in 1971. It would not make any further significant changes until 1989 when the EPA began to phase out asbestos use in almost all products in the U.S. Meanwhile, the U.K. would only be a decade away from a complete ban of asbestos across the board. Despite the shift away from asbestos that the EPA was attempting to make, the U.S. Courts overturned the EPA Asbestos Ban in 1991 due to pressure from asbestos industry lobbyists. The powerful influence of the asbestos industry is why asbestos can still be found in products manufactured today.

Prenatal Opioid Use May Adversely Impact Children Later in Life

According to a new study, opioid use during pregnancy may have a negative neurological or behavioral impact on children later in life. While previous studies have drawn a link between prenatal opioid use and adverse health outcomes in infants, the University of Missouri study found that exposure to opioids in utero can have damaging long-term effects on children, potentially impacting them into their adult years.

At issue is how opioids impact the various bacteria and microorganisms (known as the gut microbiome) inside the developing fetus. The gut microbiome serves as a measuring stick for the overall health and wellness of humans and animals.

About the Study

The University of Missouri study compared the gut microbiome of adult mice exposed in utero to the opioid oxycodone with the gut microbiome of adult mice who were not exposed to any opioids. The goal of the study was to find out how opioid exposure in gestation impacts offspring in their later years. According to the researchers, the gut microbiome of humans is very similar to the gut microbiome of mice.

The researchers identified significant disruptions to the natural balance of bacteria in the guts of the mice exposed to oxycodone in utero. The changes were linked with potential long-term impacts on both neurological and behavioral health.

More Pregnant Women Using Opioids 

It’s become increasingly common for women to use opioids during pregnancy, either due to dependency or as a result of a medical prescription. According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, from 2010 to 2017, the number of opioid-related diagnoses documented at delivery increased by 131 percent. Meanwhile, the number of babies in the U.S. born with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) increased by 82 percent from 2010 to 2017.

Neonatal abstinence syndrome occurs when a baby is exposed to a drug in utero and experiences withdrawal from the drug after birth. NAS is most often caused when a mother takes opioids while pregnant and can lead to serious problems in a baby. NAS is associated with withdrawal symptoms such as irritability, seizures, vomiting, and poor feeding in newborns. One of the researchers who led the University of Missouri study noted that children exposed to opioids during gestation are at increased risk for developing an addiction to opioids later in life.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there has been a trend toward opioids being prescribed for pain that may not be serious, despite the risks associated with these drugs.

Other Risks of Prenatal Opioid Use

Beyond the potential long-term harm posed to children whose mothers take opioids while pregnant, prenatal opioid use is associated with other risks to infants, including:

  • Neural tube defects
  • Congenital heart defects (problems with the structure of a baby’s heart)
  • Gastroschisis (a birth defect of the baby’s abdomen)
  • Stunted growth
  • Preterm delivery (birth before 37 weeks)

When it comes to opioid use during pregnancy, a significant concern is that a woman may be taking opioids without knowing she is pregnant. A baby’s cells multiply rapidly and the baby may have been exposed to the opioid for a long time before the mother knows she is pregnant.

Exposure to Pesticides During Pregnancy Linked to Brain Damage in Embryos

Exposure to Pesticides During Pregnancy Linked to Brain Damage in EmbryosBringing a new child into the world can be the most exciting event for a family. But that excitement is often short-lived once you hear that your child will be born with a severe birth defect. One particularly devastating condition is holoprosencephaly, or HPE, a brain condition that can cause moderate to severe facial deformities, developmental delays, miscarriage, and early death.

Although this birth defect can be genetic, it is often caused by environmental factors, including the use of pesticides before and during pregnancy.

When children are born with serious birth defects, such as holoprosencephaly, it can be devastating and costly to the family and for the health care and educational systems as they provide lifelong support to these children.

Medical researchers are looking at possible causes of this birth defect so we can help prevent it in the future. They study genetic information and other things that might increase risk, such as chemicals pregnant women might be exposed to.

Putting Pregnant Women at Risk

A recent study in the journal Environmental Health looked at how pesticides might be linked with HPE. They chose to study pesticides and this particular birth defect because we already know that pesticides have been linked to other birth defects and they tend to have a greater effect on a developing brain than on an adult brain.

In this study, researchers gathered a group of women who had given birth to a child with holoprosencephaly and a group of women whose child was born with Williams-Beuren Syndrome, a similar birth defect with a known genetic cause. The researchers asked women what types of pesticides they had used or had been exposed to during their pregnancy, if any, including insect repellant, flea and tick medications, and bug sprays. The researchers also asked women whether they had lived near an agricultural field during their pregnancy.

They compared the results of these different groups of women to see if pesticide use seemed to be linked more strongly to cases of HPE than to Williams-Beuren Syndrome. They found a link between all types of pesticide use they asked about and HPE, with especially strong links between the use of flea and tick medications and agricultural pesticides among the women who had lived near an agricultural field while they were pregnant.

The researchers noted that the critical period for holoprosencephaly to develop is the first trimester, often before a woman even knows she is pregnant. HPE affects 1 in 250 embryos, although many of these pregnancies result in miscarriage. It is still relatively common, affecting 1 in 10,000 babies born at full term.

The Long-Term Dangers of Pesticide Exposure

There are many different types of pesticides, some of which are commonly available for household use and some of which are mainly used in industrial and agricultural settings. The researchers in the Environmental Health study found some increased risk of holoprosencephaly with all of them.

One particularly disturbing finding in their study was the increased risk of HPE for women who live near an agricultural field. It could be easy for women to stop using insect repellant, flea and tick medicine, and bug spray when they are pregnant or are planning to get pregnant, but few neighbors can control what pesticides are used by the people nearby producing food, grass seed, Christmas trees, or other agricultural products—and they may have no way of knowing what is used to control pests right next door.

Other researchers are looking deeper into specific components of pesticides and how they might cause HPE. One study at the University of Wisconsin explored the effects of piperonyl butoxide, or PBO, on the brain development of mice. This chemical is used in many household pesticides, including the flea and tick medications associated with HPE in the Environmental Health study.

These university researchers exposed mice to PBO during the period in their pregnancies that matches the early pregnancy period so critical in a baby’s brain development. The mice exposed to PBO showed facial deformities similar to those that accompany HPE in humans. The more PBO the pregnant mouse was exposed to, the more severe the deformities in the fetus.

The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that PBO is found in more than 1,500 commercial products. But there is no requirement to label it as dangerous during pregnancy.